Architecture Sprint

Before you write a line of code, know exactly what you're building.

$5,000 – $8,000 · 1–2 weeks. An architecture document, tech stack recommendation, build plan, and cost projection. The foundation for everything that follows.

Most AI projects fail before the first deployment. Not because the technology doesn’t work — but because no one mapped the system before writing code. The team picked a model, wired up an API, and started building. Six weeks later, they discover the architecture can’t handle their data volume, their compliance requirements, or their integration constraints. They start over. Or worse — they ship something fragile and spend the next year patching it.

An architecture sprint eliminates that risk. In one to two weeks, we evaluate your data, your infrastructure, your constraints, and your goals. We design the system before building it. You get a document that answers every technical question your team will face during implementation — and a clear-eyed assessment of what’s possible, what’s hard, and what’s not worth doing.

This isn’t a slide deck with boxes and arrows. It’s a technical specification written by engineers who will be accountable for the build. Every recommendation comes with a rationale. Every tradeoff is documented. Every cost is projected. When you hand this document to your team — or to us — everyone knows exactly what they’re building and why.

If you’re evaluating whether AI can solve a specific problem, this is where you start. If you’ve already tried and it didn’t work, this is how you figure out why. If you’re ready to build but want to derisk before committing budget, this is the lowest-cost way to get there.

What you get

Six deliverables. No ambiguity. Everything documented.

System architecture document

Complete technical specification: data flow, component design, integration points, failure modes, and scaling strategy. Not slides — a working reference your team will use throughout the build.

Tech stack recommendation

Model selection, infrastructure choices, framework decisions — each with rationale, alternatives considered, and tradeoff analysis. No vendor loyalty. Best tool for the job.

Build plan with milestones

Week-by-week implementation roadmap. Dependencies mapped. Critical path identified. You know what gets built first, what can parallel, and where the risks concentrate.

Cost projection

Infrastructure costs, API costs, development effort, ongoing maintenance — all estimated with ranges and assumptions documented. No surprise invoices.

Risk assessment

What could go wrong and how we prevent it. Data quality risks, integration complexity, vendor lock-in, compliance gaps — identified before they become expensive problems.

Go/no-go recommendation

An honest assessment of whether this project should proceed as designed, be restructured, or be shelved. We tell you the truth — even when the truth is “don’t build this.”

Days 1–5

We learn your world before we design anything.

Stakeholder interviews, data audit, infrastructure review, constraint mapping. We talk to the people who will use the system, the people who will maintain it, and the people who will pay for it. We review your existing data sources, evaluate quality and volume, and identify the integration points that will define the architecture. By Friday, we know what we’re solving.

DISCOVERY SUMMARY

Stakeholders Interviewed
6 interviews completed — engineering, ops, compliance, executive
Data Sources Evaluated
4 primary sources identified | 2 require transformation | 1 quality concern flagged
Constraints Identified
Data residency: EU processing required for 40% of records
Latency: Sub-3s response time for user-facing features
Budget: $8K–12K/month infrastructure ceiling

ARCHITECTURE DELIVERABLE

Document
47 pages — system design, data flow, integration spec, deployment plan
Cost Model
Build estimate: $22K–28K | Monthly run cost: $2,100–2,800
12-month TCO: $47K–62K
Recommendation
Go — proceed to System Build phase
2 design alternatives documented for team review
Risk: data quality in Source C — recommend pilot before full build

Days 6–10

Architecture designed. Document delivered. Questions answered.

We design the system, write the specification, build the cost model, and present everything in a working session with your team. Not a presentation — a conversation. We walk through every decision, answer every question, and revise in real time. You leave with a document you trust and a plan you can execute.

Who this is for

You're evaluating AI

You have a problem that might benefit from AI but aren’t sure what it would take to build. You want a clear-eyed assessment before committing budget.

You've tried and it failed

A previous attempt didn’t deliver. You need someone to diagnose what went wrong and design an approach that addresses the root cause — not just the symptoms.

You're ready to build

You know what you need. You want to derisk the build by having the architecture validated by engineers who have shipped production AI systems.

Investment: $5,000 – $8,000

Timeline: 1–2 weeks

The sprint pays for itself if it prevents even one week of wasted development effort.

Start with clarity, not code.

Every engagement begins with an architecture sprint. It’s how we ensure we’re building the right thing — and how you evaluate us with minimal risk. If we’re not the right fit, you still walk away with a document your team can use.

Book an architecture sprint

30-minute discovery call · No pitch deck